In partnership with
Meta acquired Moltbook last week, the Reddit-style social network built for AI agents that went viral in late January. Moltbook creators Matt Schlicht and Ben Parr are joining Meta Superintelligence Labs, the division led by former Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang. Deal terms were not disclosed, but it sounds more like an ‘acquihire’.
The acquisition follows Meta's $2 billion purchase of AI agent startup Manus in December. Together the deals suggest a pattern: Meta is buying its way into the AI agent space while its own flagship models continue to lag behind Google, OpenAI and Anthropic.
Partner message
1,000+ Proven ChatGPT Prompts That Help You Work 10X Faster
ChatGPT is insanely powerful.
But most people waste 90% of its potential by using it like Google.
These 1,000+ proven ChatGPT prompts fix that and help you work 10X faster.
Sign up for Superhuman AI and get:
1,000+ ready-to-use prompts to solve problems in minutes instead of hours—tested & used by 1M+ professionals
Superhuman AI newsletter (3 min daily) so you keep learning new AI tools & tutorials to stay ahead in your career—the prompts are just the beginning
What went down
Meta confirmed the Moltbook acquisition on 10 March.
Schlicht and Parr join Meta Superintelligence Labs, starting 16 March.
OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger was separately hired by OpenAI in February.
Moltbook had 1.5 million AI agents, but it was found only 17,000 human accounts behind them.
Security researchers found the platform's database was publicly exposed.
Why does this matter?
Meta's interest is in the agent directory infrastructure, not the bot forum itself. A Meta spokesperson highlighted Moltbook's approach to "connecting agents through an always-on directory" as the appeal. With both Moltbook and Manus now absorbed, Meta is assembling the plumbing for an agentic layer across its products.
The acquisition comes at a difficult moment for Meta's own AI development. Its next model, codenamed Avocado, has been delayed to at least May after internal tests showed it trailing Google's Gemini 3.0, and leadership has reportedly discussed temporarily licensing Gemini to fill the gap.
Our take
The Moltbook deal is unlikely to be very big in scale, but as a tactic it’s interesting. Meta is spending between $115 billion and $135 billion on AI this year, yet its models keep falling short. Llama 4 disappointed last year, Behemoth was delayed, and now Avocado has been pushed back. Meanwhile, chief AI scientist Yann LeCun has left the company, and Alexandr Wang's reorganisation of Meta's research division has been turbulent. Acquiring talent and products from outside looks less like strategy and more like necessity.
Moltbook itself was largely debunked as a credible demonstration of AI agent autonomy. Researchers found duplicate messages, manipulated posts and catastrophic security flaws. Andrej Karpathy initially called it one of the most incredible things he had seen, then reversed course and called it a dumpster fire.
What Meta is buying is the team and the concept, not the viral spectacle. Whether agent-to-agent networking becomes a real product category or remains a curiosity will depend on whether companies like Meta can build something more robust than a vibe-coded experiment.
And another big thing... Musk says xAI was 'not built right'
Elon Musk admitted last week that xAI needs to be rebuilt "from the foundations up" after its coding tools failed to compete with Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex. Ten of xAI's 12 co-founders have now departed, SpaceX and Tesla managers have been brought in to audit staff, and the company is hiring aggressively to close the gap by mid-2026. The admission came six weeks after Tesla invested $2 billion in xAI and SpaceX acquired the company at a $1.25 trillion valuation.
Go even more Agentic on YouTube
AI Will Eat Social Media Alive feels relevant here.
